[meteorite-list] Re-2: Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - July 19, 2008

[Mike Jensen]

Hi Bernd
Yes I saw both of those abstracts. Unfortunately abstracts carry
almost no weight as they are not peer reviewed. So the most correct
classification based on the original work would be a Eucrite. Though
ultimately I would strongly suspect they are correct and in the future
it will be Eucrite anom. In any case it is not a achondrite anom.

-- 
Mike
--
Mike Jensen
Jensen Meteorites
16730 E Ada PL
Aurora, CO 80017-3137
303-337-4361
IMCA 4264
website: www.jensenmeteorites.com

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:17 PM,  <bernd.pauli at paulinet.de> wrote:
> Hi Fabrice, Mike and List,
>
>
> Mike wrote: "The text list this stone as a ACHANOM or achondrite anomalous.
> But if you look it up in the MB database it is listed as a Eucrite ... So you could
> have Eucrite anom ..."
>
>
> YAMAGUCHI A. et al. (2003) An anomalous eucrite, Dhofar 007, and a possible genetic
> relationship with mesosiderites (Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIV (2003) 1377.pdf).
>
> YAMAGUCHI A. et al. (2006) An anomalous eucrite, Dhofar 007, and a possible
> genetic  relationship with mesosiderites (MAPS 41-6, 2006, 863-874).
>
> Best,
>
> Bernd
>
> To: meteoriteplaya at gmail.com
>    michael at spacerocksinc.com
> Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>