[meteorite-list] Fwd: Peter's Stunning New Eucrite NWA 5230 paired with the Hupés' NWA 4883

Michael Fowler mqfowler at mac.com
Thu Aug 14 16:51:20 EDT 2008




Resent, don't think this went through the first time.

Mike


> http://www.marmet-meteorites.com/id41.html
>
> Peter writes:
>
> "It's NWA 5230, a maskelynite rich polymict eucrite breccia! Analized
> by Tony Irwing, who writes: We made a discovery of a small  
> mesodiderite
> clast in it. This is an important observation that adds to the  
> growing evidence
> for a common parent body for HEDDO and MESO meteorites! NWA 5230
> is paired with NWA 4883. TKW is 909 g."


I must disagree both with the above logic, and the rush to join the  
mesosiderite and HED parent bodies.

As for the logic, I've never heard anyone say that finding a  
carbonaceous clast in an L class meteorite means that the the two  
parent bodies are related.  It just means that at some point a  
fragment of one parent body collided with another.  If such clasts  
were common, then one might infer that the two bodies at some point in  
space and time were in relative proximity to each other.

As far as the meso's and HED's having a common parent body, that is  
nearly impossible, especially if you believe that Vesta is the Parent  
Body of the HED's.  Consider that Vesta appears to be an intact body,  
with a core, mantle and crust.  The HED's sample different depths of  
the crust.  Where is there room for the Meso Parent Body?  The MPB  
(Meso Parent Body)  was completely destroyed by the collision that  
mixed the iron core with the basaltic crust.

Vesta is intact, the MPB has been destroyed.  Therefore they can't be  
the same Parent Body.

Mike Fowler
Chicago





More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list