[meteorite-list] Cosmogentic dating, and bad science on ancient meteorite impactor?

[Darren Garrison]

On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:

>
>They dismiss the radiocarbon dates by claiming that the wood samples
>were somehow magically “contaminated” by the impact. I say “magically”, 
>because there is not a practical way that an impact, especially an imaginary 
>one, could have contaminated the wood samples buried by the landslide. 
>

There is a simpler way to identify the story as flawed-- it is published by
Adventures Unlimited.

http://www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/

(The common thread between all Adventures Unlimited publications-- all fringe
crap that would never see the light of day with a mainstream publisher).