[meteorite-list] Great picture that summarizes Peru'sscientific minds.

[Sterling K. Webb]

Hi,

    No "laws" need be invoked. The process is an
endogenous one.

    I have just completed an analysis of Thaddeus'
last 37 (a prime number) posts and have graphed their
frequency against their cross product of their fractal
dimension and the inverse of their entropy. I have
discovered a series of increases in his posting frequency
which doubles with a value that increasingly approaches
that of every 4.6692 reiterations.

    That number is the Feigenbaum constant, of course,
and reveals their content to be a one-dimensional chaos
with a period-doubling attractor. Shortly, their fractal
dimension will fall to zero, their entropy will rise to infinity,
and their source, the hypothetical Thaddeus Entity, will
undergo quantum "evaporation."


Sterling K. Webb
--------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Darren Garrison" <cynapse at charter.net>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Great picture that summarizes Peru'sscientific 
minds.


On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:01:04 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:

>WOW, it was a cartoon. I see it as perfect, showing
>Peru's scientists as being confused about the need to
>preserve their one and only meteorite fall from
>disentigrating. The Third Reich never really entered
>my mind.
>You have some serious issues, please deal with
>them.Michael Farmer

I invoke Godwin's Law on Thaddeus.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

(Also Sturgeon's Law)
______________________________________________


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thaddeus Besedin" <endophasy at yahoo.com>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 10:53 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] self-rightous posturing, African Bias,and "The 
Pearl"


Without citation, I'm self-righteous (or self
confirming), but a book by Steinbeck, called "The
Pearl," is appropriate for the problem of inequality
and prejudice that the meteorite trade can perpetuate
by affecting prices and wrinkling reputations.
You guys all think I'm on one by now; some people like
Mike or myself are vocal about things we may later
regret. My problem,  it seems, is premature inclusion
of misleading non-information as premises for argument
(I'm a victim of continental philosophy), but
scientific facts, like carbon dates or climate models,
are NEVER distorted in my posts. My difficulty is with
legal citation, it seems. So, facts and some fallacy,
but not shams and lies... .

WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE oF INFORMATION, though.