[meteorite-list] Global Warming - Scientifically provenor afarce

[Bill]

Blah, blah, blah. The fleas will never comprehend the dog.

Bill



> -----Original Message-----
> From: altmann at meteorite-martin.de
> Sent: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:36:48 +0200
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Global Warming - Scientifically provenor
> afarce
> 
> " Hätte man sämtliche Berge der ganzen Welt,
> zusammengetragen und übereinandergestellt
> und wäre zu Füßen dieses Massivs,
> ein riesiges Meer, ein breites und tiefs.
> Und stürzte nun, unter Donnern und Blitzen
> der Berg in dieses Meer – na das würd’ spritzen!"
> Heinz Erhardt
> 
> Sorry, Jerry, no time for translation, Ensisheim is coming!
> 
> Martin
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
> [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von
> Gerald
> Flaherty
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Juni 2007 18:27
> An: LITIG8NSHARK at aol.com; gmhupe at tampabay.rr.com; yankb04 at hotmail.com
> Cc: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Global Warming - Scientifically provenor
> afarce
> 
> "SOME say the world will end in fire
>  Some say ice
>  From what I've tasted of desire
>  I'd hold those who favor fire
>  But if it had to perish twice
>  I think I know enough of hate
>  To know that for destruction
>  Ice is great
>  And would suffice" Robert Frost AKA chillman
> 
> Jerry Flaherty
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <LITIG8NSHARK at aol.com>
> To: <gmhupe at tampabay.rr.com>; <yankb04 at hotmail.com>
> Cc: <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Global Warming - Scientifically proven or
> afarce
> 
> 
>> Good evening Folks,
>> 
>> Not wanting to intentionally stir the "pot of angst", I won't share my
>> opinions regarding the validity of the global warming theory......in
>> great
> 
>> part
>> because it conflicts with the beliefs of roughly half of the List and,
>> arguably,
>> neither extreme (entirely pro or con) position is capable of clear and
>> convincing scientific proof at this stage.  And also, because, in
>> greater
>> part, I will
>> admit that I am truly uncertain which argument has greater credibility.
>> 
>> I would submit two widely held, and generally accepted, scientific
>> theorems
>> to consider before taking sides in this debate:
>> 1.  Entropy
>> 2.  Perpetual Motion
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Paul Martyn
>> Savannah GA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ************************************** See what's free at
>> http://www.aol.com.
>> ______________________________________________
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> 
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> 
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list