[meteorite-list] Irons DON'T form Fusion Crust's - yes they DO
Mr EMan
mstreman53 at yahoo.com
Sun Jan 7 14:31:38 EST 2007
I defined glass in a previous post specifically as
that which is formed from fuseing/melting silicates.
Which is closest to your thrid definition of "glassy".
This isn't a discussion of commercial applications of
glass or philosophical ones. You missed the point of
this whole arguement that technical literature defines
fusion crust as containing glass -- the amorphous
state of silicates. There is no manipulation of the
terms by me. I quoted directly from the published
definitions. I used your website in research btw.
Elton
--- Eric Twelker <twelker at alaska.net> wrote:
> The only problem here is that EMan has changed the
> definition of "glassy" to make his argument work.
Here is what Princeton says:
>
> Adjective
> S: (adj) glassy (resembling glass in
> smoothness and shininess and
> slickness) "the glassy surface of the lake"; "the
> pavement was...glassy with
> water"- Willa Cather
> S: (adj) glassy, glazed ((used of eyes)
> lacking liveliness) "empty
> eyes"; "a glassy stare"; "his eyes were glazed over
> with boredom"
> S: (adj) glassy, vitreous, vitrified ((of
> ceramics) having the
> surface made shiny and nonporous by fusing a
> vitreous solution to it)
> "glazed pottery"; "glassy porcelain"; "hard vitreous
> china used for plumbing
> fixtures"
>
> I'll go with common sense on this one. Fusion crust
> is the fused rind on
> the outside of a meteorite. And people whose eyes
> are "glassy" don't all have glass eyes.
>
> Eric Twelker
More information about the Meteorite-list
mailing list