[meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re: provisionalnames and

[Moni Waiblinger]

Sonny,

this is not harassment.
Like I wrote to you before its simply an opinion of a writer writing his 
article.
The last Nevada find was thought of a find from John Blennert.
If you see it as an harassment, I am sorry, which I also told you before.

I am not Bob V.s parrot, but as a Californian meteorite hunter I would like 
to have other hunters coming into this state help the hunters that are on 
these dry lakes for number of years, logging all the finds and numbering 
them as well to have the TKW for the areas and the different classifications 
for the different finds on the lakes.

I think you are right that one could get numbers or no numbers if this is 
the Nom rules, when you think it is the time, but getting numbers to keep 
things a bit in order doesn't tell anyone that you hunt there, it is only 
known by Rhian Jones, which is kept in strictest confidence.
It does help out the hunters here in California and there are more than just 
Bob.

And just like Bob, you wouldn't'f feel so harassed by him, if you wouldn't 
want things to be the way you are wanting them to be.
Your way.
Two opinions and that is the way it goes.

So no parrot on Bob's back, just my opinion coming from California where 
things are done a bit different than Arizona.

Happy hunting,
Moni




>From: wahlperry at aol.com
>To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>CC: bolidechaser at yahoo.com, moni2555 at hotmail.com
>Subject: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re: 
>provisionalnames and numbers
>Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:24:28 -0400
>
>Dear List,
>
>I am sending this email in response to an ongoing thread regarding 
>provisional names and numbers for new finds. I hope this puts an end to the 
>thread. I have contacted the Nomenclature regarding this issue and received 
>the following response.
>
>
>
>>Dear Sonny,
>>Thanks for your phone message as well as this email.
>>You can look up the committee membership and the rules and guidelines
>on the Meteoritical Society website.
>>The Committee has no requirements regarding getting provisional
>numbers within a fixed time. In fact there is no requirement to get a 
>provisional >number at all. If you want to just submit a meteorite at the 
>time it is classified that is fine. Similarly, there is no time requirement 
>for submitting a >new find. When fragments are clearly paired it is fine to 
>include them all in the same number.
>>I hope this clarifies things.
>
>
>I hope this will end the harassment from Mr. Bob Verish and Team Verish. As 
>you can see I have done nothing wrong in the delay of getting provisonal 
>numbers and names for all of  my new finds. I have chosen to complete field 
>study work before aquiring any provisional names or numbers.
>Below is an excerpt from one of Bob's emails.
>
>>Guess I'm just jealous that Sonny gets to do things
>>his way, and I'm forced to abide by "guidelines".
>
>http://www.meteorite-times.com  ( Nevada Picture Of The Day) The last 2 
>months have been focused negativley on my finds.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Sonny
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free 
>from AOL at AOL.com.
>______________________________________________
>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

_________________________________________________________________
Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. 
http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag3