[meteorite-list] [ebay] ending in about 2 days

[stan .]

>
>It is obvious you want it both ways. You base your Brachinite

Brachnite? i thought we were talking about angrites. In any event i am not 
basing the potential pairing on anything i see - as i said i am just 
relaying information provided to me by my sources. researchers and 
moroccains alike

>pairing visually yet your Acap looks identical to 12 kilograms of material 
>the Aaronson's were selling over the last year. You are in touch with Dr. 
>Bunch, ask him about NWA 1839/3133 as this has already been addressed on 
>the List in some detail and as usual you came out on the short side of the 
>stick.

I did? from what i recall you claimed there was new data that argued against 
the 1839/3133 pairing.

I also recall Jeff Grossman posting to the list saying something to the 
effect that based on the data avalible currently a claim of pairing wasnt 
unreasonable.

you claim there is new data that argues against this - i have asked you to 
provide the data 4 times now in the last few hours and yet you dont offer 
anything to support your claim other than tales of this mysteryous 'new 
data'. I fail to see how i'm the one comming up short either then or now on 
this issue. I'm not the one going on about 'new data' that i cant produce.

>Ask Dr. Bunch if your new Acap is paired to all of the other 12 kilograms 
>unless you are using another Aaronson number in which case he will not 
>report back to you.

I'll be sure to ask next time I speak with Dr. Bunch. in the mean time if 
you look at http://www4.nau.edu/meteorite/Meteorite/PrimitiveAchondrite.html 
you will see the minerology of the paired stones all are virtually 
identical, whereas the data for nwa 2775 is nowhere near close.