[meteorite-list] Antarctic comet dust "perhaps" in better conditionthan Stardust

[Adam Hupe]

How could this dust be in better condition than Stardust samples when only a
third of it might have been contributed by a comet?  How can they be sure
this material came from a comet? With Stardust you know with 100% certainty
where it came from plus there is no terrestrial contamination.

Check out this exact quote from the article:

"When they melted the snow and filtered out anything more than 25
micrometres across, almost a third of the particles they found were from
space."

The whole thing stinks of posturing to me!

Adam



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Darren Garrison" <cynapse at charter.net>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:21 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Antarctic comet dust "perhaps" in better
conditionthan Stardust


Anyone have access to the full article?

http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/mg19125594.100.html
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list