[meteorite-list] Re: Minimum crater size for central uplift ?

[Kevin Forbes]

I remember reading an article not too long ago that provided much info on 
this, as well as a formula that might predict various outcomes, depending on 
which body in our solar system you were interested. I could not find it on 
my HDD, so I did a search on google for 'impact central uplift formula'

http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=impact+central+uplift+formula&meta=

and found this, it provides the formula.

http://www.bookrags.com/sciences/earthscience/impact-crater-woes-01.html

There is a fair amout of other good reading provided by the search.
All the best, Kevin.


>From: "Charles O'Dale" <codale0806 at rogers.com>
>To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>Subject: [meteorite-list] Re: Minimum crater size for central uplift ?
>Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:25:01 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from six.pairlist.net ([209.68.2.254]) by mc10-f1.hotmail.com 
>with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:24:54 -0800
>Received: from six.pairlist.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by six.pairlist.net 
>(Postfix) with ESMTPid 9B75E8CA42; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:24:53 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from mu.pair.com (mu.pair.com [209.68.1.23])by six.pairlist.net 
>(Postfix) with SMTP id 947CA8C95Ffor 
><meteorite-list at lists6.meteoritecentral.com>;Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:24:52 
>-0500 (EST)
>Received: (qmail 25016 invoked by uid 7111); 13 Nov 2005 19:24:52 -0000
>Received: (qmail 25013 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2005 19:24:52 -0000
>Received: from mailwash5.pair.com (66.39.2.5)by mu.pair.com with SMTP; 13 
>Nov 2005 19:24:52 -0000
>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by mailwash5.pair.com 
>(Postfix) with SMTP id 6D8E58D623for 
><meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>;Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:24:51 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com 
>(smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com[206.190.36.82])by mailwash5.pair.com 
>(Postfix) with SMTP id 49BD28D65Efor 
><meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>;Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:24:51 -0500 (EST)
>Received: (qmail 33104 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2005 19:24:51 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO mdguo5m3tdnvnv) 
>(voltage?contrast at 24.43.121.118with login)by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com 
>with SMTP; 13 Nov 2005 19:24:51 -0000
>X-Message-Info: +4Ohsb/xAqltwBu07j5E87VkCDebyeKbSi+PdcKTMsg=
>X-Original-To: meteorite-list at lists6.meteoritecentral.com
>Delivered-To: meteorite-list at six.pairlist.net
>Delivered-To: 
>arthur-meteoritecentral:com-meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; 
>d=rogers.com;h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE;b=OTgKBSWDkZTunsqY3FUxVU43RHe0gwckVv40tnfK1mv5t5TgQyF1zzS1QXV63gm6+m1o5CHTbBVvBIYVMpRBrJJf5VWbX2wvTskQHyOB2Rmt7V12Uk5R+3bFM7p0Qjr21St8rG497g5qEoCg/Q5JSfwMJWy+x5iFoOmVAGHL51s=; 
>References: <20051113171558.060A68D0AC at six.pairlist.net>
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
>X-BeenThere: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: Meteorite Discussion Forum <meteorite-list.meteoritecentral.com>
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list>,<mailto:meteorite-list-request at meteoritecentral.com?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/meteorite-list>
>List-Post: <mailto:meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>List-Help: 
><mailto:meteorite-list-request at meteoritecentral.com?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: 
><http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list>,<mailto:meteorite-list-request at meteoritecentral.com?subject=subscribe>
>Errors-To: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
>Return-Path: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Nov 2005 19:24:54.0366 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[ECF55FE0:01C5E887]
>
>Michel:
>
>IMHO, "it all depends". From my research, the best I could come up with:
>
>quoted from my web-site: 
>http://www.ottawa.rasc.ca/astronomy/earth_craters/intro.html
>
>"In this article, I will present the craters that I have explored in the 
>order of their size, starting with simple craters, moving to complex 
>craters and finishing with multiring basins. The transition size between 
>simple to complex craters is 2km in sediments and 4km in crystalline rocks. 
>The transition size between complex to ringed basin craters is 10 to 50 
>km."
>
>I would love more input on this.
>
>Thanks
>Charles O'Dale
>Meeting Chair
>Ottawa RASC
>http://www.ottawa.rasc.ca/astronomy/earth_craters/index.html
>
>
>
>
>>Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:05:06 +0100
>>From: "michel  FRANCO" <michel at caillou-noir.com>
>>Subject: [meteorite-list] Minimum crater size for central uplift ?
>>To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>>Message-ID: <000101c5e86c$03ac1b50$2101a8c0 at your6da8e58346>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>>Dear list
>>
>>I was wandering what is the minimum size of terrestrial impact crater
>>that show a central uplift.
>>Best regards
>>
>>Michel FRANCO
>>IMCA 3869
>>
>>
>
>______________________________________________
>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list