[meteorite-list] metorwrongs...

Tom Knudson peregrineflier at npgcable.com
Thu Mar 24 16:14:53 EST 2005


Hi Bob and list.
"My main point is that even legal terms are defined by
common usage, and the common usage of "meteorwrong"
isn't applied to "everything that isn't properly
classified"."

I have to agree with Bob,  according to Manoj, Dean Bessey is the worlds
largest supplier of meteor-wrongs, I don't think so!

Thanks, Tom
peregrineflier <><
IMCA 6168
http://www.frontiernet.net/~peregrineflier/Peregrineflier.htm
http://fstop.proboards24.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Verish" <bolidechaser at yahoo.com>
To: <manojpai at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Meteorite-list Meteoritecentral" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:06 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] metorwrongs...


> Hi Manoj,
>
> You wrote:
> "Hope this help. ;-)"
>
> No, Manoj, as you may have already surmised, this does
> not help at all.  You should advise your "legal
> advisor" to go back and research this some more.
> Until then, the advice you were given should only be
> considered as one lawyer's opinion.
>
> The main point of disagreement is with the statement
> that everything is a "meteorwrong until it is properly
> classified".   It is a fact that there are many
> meteorites that are properly IDENTIFIED, but which
> have never been and never will be classified.
>
> Your legal advisor seems to be implying that most
> meteoriticists consider anything that isn't properly
> classified by them to be a "meteorwrong".  I have
> rarely seen them use that term in print, and have
> never heard them use it on any unexamined specimen.
>
> I'm not saying that there is a common consensus on how
> the term "meteor-wrong" is defined, but it would be
> safe to say that the majority opinion would hold that
> a "term TBD" becomes a "meteorite" only after a
> qualified professional has IDENTIFIED it as such.  But
> should that same expert deem the "term TBD" to be NOT
> a meteorite, at that point in time it becomes that
> other thing, whatever you wish to call it, but which
> has been commonly called a "meteorwrong".
>
> My main point is that even legal terms are defined by
> common usage, and the common usage of "meteorwrong"
> isn't applied to "everything that isn't properly
> classified".
>
> Bob V.
>
> ------------- Original Message -------------
> [meteorite-list] metorwrongs...
> Manoj Pai manojpai at yahoo.com
> Thu Mar 24 13:04:17 EST 2005
>
> > Someone has just asked me an interesting question,
> > what do you call a "potential meteorite" that isn't
> > a 'meteorite' nor a confirmed 'meteorwrong'
>
> I would not like to spoil the fun of most of you, but
> would like to point out that I asked this question to
> our legal advisor, here. After going through some of
> the info on a few sites and books, he concluded, that
> the 'potential meteorite' will continue to be called a
> meteorwrong, untill classified and identified as a
> meteorite. Hope this help. ;-)
>
> Manoj Pai
> Ahmedabad, INDIA
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.1 - Release Date: 3/23/2005
>
>




More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list