[meteorite-list] meteor-wrong (most likely)

[j.divelbiss at att.net]

Jim and Bill,

This meteor-wrong has been studied extensively. I believe the consensus of many to date is that it is terrestrial, and possibly man-made. Matt Morgan was involved in one such study and that reference is somewhere in the archives. Here is a statement from the meteorite society.  

http://meteoriticalsociety.org/bulletin/shirokovsky.pdf

JD


-------------- Original message from Bill Southern <Nugget-Shooter at direcway.com>: -------------- 


> The photo came from an ebay ad that ended yesterday and I would guess he has 
> more there for sale. 
> 
> Bill 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: 
> To: 
> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 11:16 AM 
> Subject: [meteorite-list] meteor-wrong 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Bill, I have had the same question. Now to me it looks like the real 
> > thing. In fact I would like a piece of it! Any addresses to send for 
> > one? If it is a meteor-wrong it is a good one. Perhaps it is totaly 
> > different! New things are being found all the time. New fish, new bugs, 
> > new plants, giant geode caves, etc. why not new meteorites? 
> > ______________________________________________ 
> > Meteorite-list mailing list 
> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 
> > 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________ 
> Meteorite-list mailing list 
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list