[meteorite-list] What are the FeO/MnO Ratios for the Kalahari 008, 009?

Martin Altmann Altmann at Meteorite-Martin.de
Wed Aug 10 05:31:34 EDT 2005


Hi Adam,

I don't know strewnfield stats so well,
but for the case, that they aren't fragments of the same stone, which were
transported later by a mechanism, the heck I dunno which,
wouldn't it be highly improbable, that two stones of a fall landed so close
to each other, especially as they have such different sizes?

???
Martin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites at comcast.net>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What are the FeO/MnO Ratios for the Kalahari
008,009?


> Dear List,
>
> An update, it looks like even though the two Kalahari lunar meteorites
have
> completely different classifications they are paired.  This makes sense
> since they were found just 50 meters apart.  The abstract below proves
this
> since they both share the same CRE and terrestrial ages:
>
> http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2005/pdf/5270.pdf
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> ------------------------------------
> Adam Hupe
> The Hupe Collection
> Team LunarRock
> IMCA 2185
> raremeteorites at comcast.net
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list