[meteorite-list] NWA 869

Peanut .. cj_peanut at msn.com
Mon Sep 13 16:22:49 EDT 2004


I don't understand this:

Adam said: "Using the name NWA 869 is meaningless because like Kem Kem it
has become a catchall stone. I would go as far as to say, you would better
off selling NWA 869 as unclassified because an unclassified stone seems to
be worth more on the open market these days."

I have a kilo of Unclassified, I bought 869 to have some variety. I also 
sell Dag 476,NWA 3118,3111,3112,1792,1906, 1929 and 1930.
I understand what your saying this stone has become, but why perpetuate this 
being a shit stone?

There are new collectors and future dealers reading these postings and to a 
new collector, they may take this meteorite as a specimen not worth getting.

Adam, I mean no disrespect here, just an opinion!

Cj





More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list