[meteorite-list] Comet Pioneer Fred Whipple Dies

[josecamposcomet]

? 
Its very sad news indeed. I met Prof. Fred Whipple in May/1982 in Boston, during the 1st Comet Workshop held at the Smithsonian Inst., Harvard Observatory.
I had come by plane from Durban, South Africa, to attend this 5 day meeting. I had the chance to talk to him then, he was a quiet, soft spoken person. I treasure those moments spent there and the photos of myself taken next to him. 
José Campos
Portugal
 

	-----Mensagem original----- 
	De: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com em nome de bernd.pauli at paulinet.de 
	Enviada: ter 31-08-2004 19:11 
	Para: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 
	Cc: 
	Assunto: [meteorite-list] Comet Pioneer Fred Whipple Dies
	
	

	Ron Baalke wrote:
	
	> This is sad news. The Whipple Shields on the Stardust spacecraft,
	> which protected the spaceraft during its Comet Wild 2 encounter
	> earlier this year, were named in his honor. I first corresponded
	> with Whipple in 1997, and he wrote this letter to the project:
	
	> http://stardust.jpl.nasa.gov/science/whipple_letter.html
	
	> Fred Whippled was invited by the project to the Stardust
	> launch in 1999, where I first met him in person.
	
	
	WHIPPLE F.L. (1987) The Black Heart of Comet Halley
	(Sky and Telescope, Mar 1987, pp. 242-245, excerpt):
	
	Fred L. Whipple, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
	
	For decades I have wondered what a comet's nucleus would look like. The
	idea that comets are flying sand banks (spawned by their association with
	meteor showers) dominated the scene for much of the 19th and 20th centuries.
	But by 1950 the observations in hand proved to me that a "dirty snowball" was
	a much more reasonable description, and it still fits. As for shape, I expected
	the nucleus to be irregularly oval, perhaps with knobs or other protuberances.
	This bumpy structure, I reasoned, would have resulted from many smaller snowballs
	coming together at low speeds, or from the uneven loss of an irregular mixture
	of substances. More recently, careful reanalysis of Halley photographs from 1910
	had left me prepared for, possibly, large valleys and rifts in the nucleus. I even
	entertained the provocative idea that Halley might be a binary object.
	
	The years of anticipation turned to months, then days, as the Vega and Giotto
	spacecraft approached their target. I worried whether the surrounding dust cloud,
	illuminated by glaring sunlight, would so outshine the nucleus as to render it
	unobservable. After all, the encounters coincided with the time of maximum activity,
	about a month after perihelion.
	
	They would have been safer a month or so later, giving Halley's dust production a
	chance to die down a bit. But the lack of more powerful launch vehicles forced the
	spacecraft to intercept the comet near the ecliptic plane, and this geometry dictated
	the encounter dates in early March. Even so, I was more optimistic than some, relying
	largely on the hope that the opacity of the dust cloud would block enough sunlight to
	subdue the nucleus' activity.
	
	The days dwindled to hours then minutes. With a final frantic rush, our robot emissaries
	swept through Halley. Motors whirred, shutters opened, and at long last the waiting was over.
	
	______________________________________________
	Meteorite-list mailing list
	Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
	http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list