[meteorite-list] BCC "Meteorites" [was Milestones] PLEASE READ

[McomeMeteorite Meteorite]

satisfy you that  characters sell fake lunar material to the people and take 
in turn this.....

For the new moroccan fall I am not the unique to have doubts to care, I have 
received many emails in private where many say this fall is many many 
strange....immeditaly classificated when for have a analysis you have to 
waith weeks or months.....a 2 mt crater for a 8 kg. meteorite....wow, 
Alfianello is 228 kg. and when is fall have created a crater of 70 cm. deep 
for 1 mt. large.....



>From: joseph_town at att.net
>To: "McomeMeteorite Meteorite" <meteorites at hotmail.com>
>CC: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] BCC "Meteorites" [was Milestones] PLEASE READ
>Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:00:54 +0000
>
>Damn Matteo,
>
>Why in the world do you find it necessary to point out the obvious? Anyone 
>on this list that sees these absurdities can make their own instant 
>judgments as you do. Crazy as it is, isn't it prudent to reserve comment? 
>You sure made an example of your contradictory self with your reactionary 
>posts concerning the new fall announcement. Your rude criticism of Mr. Aziz 
>is a typical example.
>
>Bill
>
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
>From: "McomeMeteorite Meteorite" <meteorites at hotmail.com>
> > sharpen, DeRusse has not nothing to that to see with the science, but 
>alone
> > with the lie
> >
> > Matteo
> >
> > >From: drtanuki <drtanuki at yahoo.com>
> > >To: "S. Ray DeRusse" 
><srd at ispwest.com>,meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> > >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] BCC "Meteorites" [was Milestones] PLEASE 
>READ
> > >Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:50:32 -0800 (PST)
> > >
> > >
> > >Dear List,
> > >    My message was taken out of context in that I
> > >cannot confirm what Mr. DeRusse has or does not have.
> > >I did write what was written as stated; but this is
> > >NOT any confirmation that Mr. DeRusse is doing
> > >science.  I merely stated that sometimes for science
> > >to make big advances the scientists must think outside
> > >of the "Box". Science deals with facts and not wishful
> > >thinking or dreams.
> > >   In science if we have a new theory it is the duty of
> > >the researcher to PROVE his/her case with FACT, step
> > >by step.  It is not the duty of science to disprove
> > >someone's belief.  The burden of proof lies on the
> > >person making the claim.  dirk ross...tokyo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >__________________________________
> > >Do you Yahoo!?
> > >Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
> > >http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > >______________________________________________
> > >Meteorite-list mailing list
> > >Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> > >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Blocca le pop-up pubblicitarie con MSN Toolbar! http://toolbar.msn.it/
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Filtri antispamming e antivirus per la tua casella di posta 
http://www.msn.it/msn/hotmail