AW: WG: [meteorite-list] Classification question
David Weir
dgweir at earthlink.net
Thu May 13 03:54:52 EDT 2004
Jörn Koblitz wrote:
>
> Correct. It simply mean that no finer classification has been done. It's just a bit more work to get the subtype classification. A 3.0 is actually the most primitive, most unequilibrated and rarest type of unequilibrated ordinary chondrite.
>
> BTW: A petrologic type 2 has never been assigned to any ordinary chondrite. Only to carbonaceous chondrites.
>
> Jörn
Hi Jörn,
It was proposed in a paper I read a while back that Semarkona may be
consistent with a petrographic type 2 classification due to aqueous
alteration. I guess it's possible.
David
More information about the Meteorite-list
mailing list