[meteorite-list] New slices: LAMPIAYRIE from Burkina Faso

[Michael Farmer]

YAWN, Adam, dont try and drag me into another fight just a few days after I
get back on the list. I know that is your goal, and two people have already
called me regarding your attempt. It is getting old.
If you have proof that there is 250 kilos of this, SHOW us or dont bother
saying it.
I have been to Burkina Faso two times, and know the seller, I bought all he
offered to me. I am sure they are just holding all these hundreds of kilos
back so that someone else will pay them less money.
Mike Farmer
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adam Hupe" <adamhupe at comcast.net>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Cc: "Meteoryt.net" <marcin at meteoryt.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New slices: LAMPIAYRIE from Burkina Faso


> Hi Again,
>
> Thank you for clearing up the IMB issue as the specimens we have did not
> indicate this.  After revisiting your web-site I see how it was
> misinterpreted.  Thank you for showing the largest fragment thus far
> reported. At 4.25 kilos and only a fraction of the stone it came from we
are
> beginning to believe the 250 plus kilogram figure we heard as the TKW of
> this fall.  Could this fragment have come from the rumored 60 kilogram
main
> mass?
>
> Thank you, once again, for clearing up the IMB issue.
>
> Adam and Greg Hupe
> The Hupe Collection
> IMCA 2185
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Meteoryt.net" <marcin at meteoryt.net>
> To: "Adam Hupe" <adamhupe at comcast.net>;
> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New slices: LAMPIAYRIE from Burkina Faso
>
>
> > > Congratulations on being the first to bring this new fall to market.
> This
> > > is some very nice looking material.  I see on your website that you
are
> > > calling it an L IMB.  I was told it classified as an L5, does anybody
> know
> >
> > no,no no. I add tooday new slices of Burkina Fall AND new slices of
> Suevite
> > in Impact Breccia section, so together this looks like I called
Lampiayrie
> > (or Batiawo as Mike write) IMB. My mistake and now fixed.
> >
> > > if this correct?  Most IMBs are shock darkened and show material flow
is
> > why
> > > I am asking. This material seems to show a single light colored
> lithology.
> > > Does anybody have a recent TKW figure for this fall?  Several figures
> have
> > > been passed around and I am curious to which one is correct.
> > >
> > > The curious want to know,
> >
> > About a TKW I dont know. But I dont think that this 2kg specimen is
really
> > main mass, becouse I have photos of  3 specimens and largest is fragment
> > 4.25kg. www.meteoryt.net\ogloszenia.htm .
> >
> >
> > -----[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-----[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-----
> > http://www.Meteoryt.net             marcin at meteoryt.net
> > http://www.PolandMET.com       marcin at polandmet.com
> > http://www.Gao-Guenie.com      GSM +48(607)535 195
> > --------[ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society ]--------
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>