[meteorite-list] Sharklike Acrimonious Humo(u)r 101

[Dave Andrews]

Wow!  I had always thought of Gregory (Mr. Sharkster) as one of the 
list's more benign creatures (unless provoked).  I'm not aware of what 
you two had said to each other in private about Normandy or whatever, 
but I think the reply Doug gave him was quite uncalled for.  "F_rting" 
and "a__hole" and the such.  Maybe Gregory's sarcastic point was, that 
some of us don't really like to feel belittled by a bunch of 
"Techno-babble"...especially when it's about 3 pages of text or more.  
If so, you best spell it correctly?  We all realize that Doug is a very 
intelligent and talented person with loads of insight (to say the 
least), but some of us probably don't want our face rubbed in our 
supposed ignorance.

Now, I don't know what you two had going in private, but I've never seen 
you (Bernd) go off on anyone like that before.  I'm guessing I don't 
know the whole story and will leave it as such and offer my apologies 
now for even mentioning it.

Hope everyone can work it out between themselves and the list can go 
on.  I meant no offense to anyone and hope none was taken.

Probably said too much already,
Dave



bernd.pauli at paulinet.de wrote:

>>Thanks for the window on the soul
>>    
>>
>
>.. said the undisputed master of hypocritical ceremonies who notoriously deigns
>to provoke even the most benevolent list members with unwarranted comments
>that only reflect his mean intentions and motives. Comparing Doug to J. Warren
>is as provocatively mean and sarcastic as trying to make someone believe that I
>thought that the June 06 invasion of the Allied Forces in Normandy was a mistake.
>
>OK, you self-appointed fomenter, I will NOW apologize for having sent part of  your
>ignominious comments to the List. I did make a mistake because I had assumed it
>had been sent via the list. I was too rash because it was deep sadness over thousands
>of young lives lost, no more and no less, but it was a mistake. I DO NOT regret having
>sent it to the List because it shows, once again, as so often before, that your prime goal
>is stirring trouble (Kevin Kichinka would be able to contribute a lot here).
>
>Good night to all the good people that aren't "barbaric flamers", to all those who want to
>"maintain critical mass", and to all those who don't want this list to "decline in quality".
>
>End of this thread (on my part) !
>
>Bernd
>
>To: Sharkkb8 at aol.com
>    MexicoDoug at aol.com
>Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>
>______________________________________________
>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>  
>