[DogParkList] Thank you, MacloggerDX
Terrence R. Redding, Ph.D.
terry at oltraining.com
Sat Mar 1 08:52:06 EST 2008
Yes, and thanks.
I thought it might be a requirement of the Dxpedition - but see now that it
is needed to separate contacts within MacLoggerDX for better tracking of
countries worked (DXCC IDs).
Yes, very elegant.
Terry - W6LMJ
On 3/1/08 8:27 AM, "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <M0XDF at Alphadene.co.uk> wrote:
> I think by now you would have seen Don's reply about how that works - quiet
> an elegant solution I think - if you not sure, come back and I'll elucidate!
>
>
> On 01/03/2008 12:50, "Terrence R. Redding, Ph.D." <terry at oltraining.com>
> sent:
>
>> Hmm, I went looking for VP6DX-D and found comments on VP6DXD and VP6DX/D -
>> but no explanation as to why the "D" was needed.
>>
>> Terry - W6LMJ
>>
>>
>> On 2/29/08 6:07 PM, "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <M0XDF at Alphadene.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> So, picking up that Terrence did not know to do that either - how do we
>>> figure out that sort of thing?
>>> How do I know that certain calls need a 'little bit more'?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29/02/2008 23:05, "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <M0XDF at Alphadene.co.uk> sent:
>>>
>>>> I hadn't realised I needed to do that, so what difference does it make, I
>>>> assume the -D is not included in an ADIF (I've already upload mine to eQSL
>>>> &
>>>> LoTW)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 29/02/2008 22:54, "Don Agro" <dagro at dogparksoftware.com> sent:
>>>>
>>>>> Don't forget to log VP6DX as "VP6DX-D", for the Ducie Island dxpedition.
>
More information about the DogParkList
mailing list