[DogParkList] Re: net logging

[Don Agro]

Hi David,

On Mar 29, 2004, at 6:05 PM, David Ferrington wrote:

> Firstly, I'd like to apologise to the list for using non-ascii - it 
> just
> looks awful when you see it come back!

No problem David - it's still readable.

> Don, what's the reasoning behind a new log for each net?
> And is that a completely new log for each net meeting, or just per net
> (club)?

It's not a requirement - just an option. You can organize it any way 
you like.

You could have one log for everything, or one log for nets and one log 
for DX, one log for each contest etc.

It all depends on your operating habits and what makes most sense for 
you.

Size matters too - MacLoggerDX logs greater than 10,000 QSO's can get 
unweildy on slower machines.

Hopefully some others will chime in with short descriptions of how they 
organize their logs.

Mine are highly atypical - I have one log for my own DX and a whole 
bunch of others that are actually user's logs for debugging purposes 
etc.

Hope this helps.

73 Don Agro VE3VRW

D o g   P a r k   S o f t w a r e   L t d .

email: dagro@dogparksoftware.com
   www: http://www.dogparksoftware.com
     iChat AV:dogpark@mac.com